Monday, November 16, 2009

It's Not To Much To Ask For: The Academic Librarian

An academic from Princeton came across the Chapman blog and wrote the following response on their Princeton blog entitled "Academic Librarian".

Read It.
*
*
*
*
*
*


A lot of people have told me or suggested that the focus should be more on tearing down Chapman's argument than focusing on the other things. I generally agree, however I've yet to find anyone other than Chapman who will defend his argument on its merit (and he said he won't comment publicly about it anymore). This entry I believe is one of the best representations of the type of incredulity I think any educated person, or at least any academic or scholar ought to experience upon examining Chapman's argument.

As far as updates go we are now over 11 pages of signatures for the petition, and I can confirm the AP story made it to print in Indy and South Bend (and I'm pretty sure Muncie but not positive). There was no tabling/petitioning today due to my investigation of the various details regarding the University's harassment policy, a trip to Vice-Provost Taylor's office, and one on one meeting with Chapman. I have every intention to resume collecting petitions Wednesday although there is some degree of bureaucratic red tape involved in officially reserving space.

**Edit 1** For the sake of disclosure, I met with Chapman primarily because I kept being asked if I had and, while I didn't really have anything to say to him, I figured there was some benefit for both of us to put a face and person behind our words and I figured that he deserves a chance to be able to say anything he had to say to me. The meeting was civil but honest.

11 comments:

  1. I actually found this that defended him...http://phibetacons.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YmM3MzRiMDY3MmE1OThmN2JiZjFhNDQyNGIwMzY0NGQ=

    ReplyDelete
  2. oh there are plenty of defenses of him of that nature... I've yet to find someone say his argument is logical, reasonable, responsible, factually correct, valid- that's what i mean by 'merit'

    the only possible exception is the guy who started the petition to have me expelled: http://townhall.com/columnists/MikeAdams/2009/11/17/the_expel_kevin_casimer_petition&Comments=true?page=1

    ReplyDelete
  3. If there is no one else who will defend him on the merits, is there any rational reason to organize a campus wide protest? If you were actually spending any time debunking his claims there would be a point, but come on. In the end you're sending the message that some speech is not acceptable and should be not just refuted, but supressed.

    A Campus wide protest of opinions that are so ridiculous as to not even require refutation by the very people protesting them.... Thats not responcible or productive, just petty and childish.

    If you're gonna string up a strawman, at least find one which is worth beating down.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Some speech isn't acceptable for a university professor if that title is supposed to actually mean something.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The only thing a title, such as professor, should mean is that a person has achieved a certian level of distinction in their field.

    It should not mean that person is prohibited from expressing their mind on whatever issue they feel appropriate or that it is appropriate for them to be attacked as a person for having an opinion which is unpopular.

    The appropriate responince to learning of Chapman's ludricious posting is to ignore it and move on, not publize it in order to knock down an opinion virtually no one agrees with to begin with.

    ReplyDelete
  6. it would appear that firefox's spellcheck doesn't work in these comment forums

    *certain
    *response
    *ludicrous
    *publicize

    ReplyDelete